Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:40:20PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > I often upgrade by preserving /home and a few key config files but wiping
> > the system disk. Much faster than the anaconda upgrade option, with cleaner
> > results. But if I do that, and the UIDs used by packages at install time
> > change, there will be mis-owned files on the system.
> A system service should NOT have a home directory in /home so all of the
> UIG/GID in /home should be above 500.

That's irrelevant. If it creates files in (say) /var as whatever user it
picks at random, and then I copy my old password file over the new one, it
will be All Br0ke. (And that's not even considering the annoyance of dealing
with any *new* system users.)

[...]
> system accounts should not have home directories in /home anyway.

I have no idea why you're all on about /home.


> But really - just like you need to preserve your ssl keys, a sysadmin
> should preserve /etc/passwd and /etc/group. I never personally
> save /etc/shadow - I just use the saved /etc/passwd to recreate users
> keeping uid/gid the same.

See above. :)


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 79 degrees Fahrenheit.

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux