On 9/15/05, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The whole discussion is pointless as long as there are virtual provides > in the Extras package which interfere with Core package names. This is a > show-stopper. Upgrading xscreensaver-base currently removes > gnome-screensaver, simply because gnome-screensaver "Provides: > xscreensaver-base". damn it, you're right. So basically there needs to be a seperate virtual provides that is not keyed to a packagename that both xscreensavers-base and gnome-screensaver can provide that xscreensavers-extras can require. Like the "webclient" provides shared by several core packages. -jef -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
