On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 12:42 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Its not clear to me whether or not gnome-screensaver is actually > mutually exclusive with xscreensaver. It might be more like > mozilla/firefox like relationship. with the xscreensaver-extras are > "plugins" that both can use. > No, they aren't mutually exclusive. > If there are no explict file conflicts users might very well be able > to have both installed...or replace one with the other for similar > functionality. Certaintly users will not be able to run both > xscreensaver and gnome-screensaver at the same time..but I don't think > that sort of thing is a blocker from extras. I haven't actually tried > to mock up his specfile yet to see if there are file conflicts though. No file conflicts. > If the intent is to have installation of gnome-screensaver to always > remove xscreensaver-base automatically..then no..thats not extras > appropriate. That's not my intend, but until the xscreensaver requirement in the control-center rpm is changed, I don't see another way installing both at the same time. -- Ricardo Veguilla González <veguilla@xxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
