On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:56:40 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 9/10/05, Ricardo Veguilla González <veguilla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >http://ece.uprm.edu/~veguilla/fedora/gnome-screensaver/gnome-screensaver.spec > > Okay... i made the small change in the Specfile and I got a binary > that installs in parallel with xscreensaver. I also made an example > rebuild of control-center with the requires change. > If you use update to that control-center binary.. you can then remove > xscreensaver-base if gnome-screensaver is installed. Thats basically > how you solve the problems in the original post to this thread. We'd > actually be better off if we could drop that screensaver "packagename" > requirement in control-center completely.. since its sort of abusing > "requirement" in the strict sense...but thats a long debate to be had > with the Core desktop developers and its not going to be solved in > this thread. > > rawhide synced rpms and srpms are located at: > jef.is-a-geek.com/downloads/gnome-screensaver/ The whole discussion is pointless as long as there are virtual provides in the Extras package which interfere with Core package names. This is a show-stopper. Upgrading xscreensaver-base currently removes gnome-screensaver, simply because gnome-screensaver "Provides: xscreensaver-base". -- Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Core release 5 (Development) - Linux 2.6.13-1.1549_FC5 loadavg: 1.90 1.51 1.33 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging