On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 08:38 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > Shouldn't be a problem. We'll just pretend we're anaconda and --nodeps > the remove, knowing that the install is coming right afterward. In fact, its not even a problem. skvidal> it's a simultaneous transaction skvidal> if bar (installed) requires foo skvidal> and you're removing baz (provides foo) skvidal> and installing quux(provides foo) skvidal> and it is all in one transaction then there are no broken dependencies spot> ok. :) then its a non issue. skvidal> there's no need for --nodeps skvidal> right but I feel it is a necessity to smack any discussion of --nodeps at all times :) Consider me duly smacked. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
