On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 18:56 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> rpmlint currently whines if a package installs one init script, and the
> init script name doesn't match the package name. If more than one init
> scripts are installed from one package, it doesn't emit this warning.
>
> I don't think there are any naming guidelines for init scripts currently
> in effect, so I'm wondering if I should just filter out the warning in
> future rpmlint package revisions, or if people think that the way
> rpmlint currently wants the init scripts named would be make a good
> packaging guideline.
>
I think it is a good guideline if possible. When the name makes sense.
package 'sendmail' makes sense to have a sendmail init.d script. There
are a lot of examples though of package <name> that has a daemon
component named <name>d. Maybe do a warning if the init script isn't
%{name} || %{name}d ?
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
