core dev's have a ways to go

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just some frustration venting mostly, but Core dev's have a ways to go before "their" packages will ever come close to Extras quality, especially when they ignore good/valid suggestions and the very helpful stuff on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

Case in point:
openobex: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/186457 (*)
	marked INVALID
rpm: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/145978
	marked WONTFIX
(rpm-devel's Requires: have been broken for a *very* long time)

Nice, huh?

Hopefully, the same won't happen to the other openobex packaging bugs/suggestions I reported yesterday:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/186458
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/186460
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/186463 (*)

OK, I feel better now.

(*) which can cause kdebluetooth (see bug #186452) to fail to build (especially outside of mock) on fc5.

-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux