On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 22:18 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: >On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:46 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > >> (Do we need the additional "Provides: kernel-module-openafs", >> isn't that a given, since the Name: is the same?) > >Right, not needed. > >I see there's no "Provides: kernel-modules" or somesuch, was that left >out on purpose? If I'm not mistaken, that was used previously to flag the package as something that yum/apt/whatever needed to perform nasty hacks on. If thats all it serves, then lets not use it. I want to fix it in rpm so we don't need it. ~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
