Re: [Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:46 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:


(Do we need the additional "Provides: kernel-module-openafs",
isn't that a given, since the Name: is the same?)


Right, not needed.

I see there's no "Provides: kernel-modules" or somesuch, was that left
out on purpose?


Sorry about that. You are correct. When I was writting that I not only had up the e-mails from this list, but also a spec file from our older openafs kernel-module. I basically cut and pasted one too many.


Troy
p.s. Sorry for the delay, I wrote that e-mail and then got tied up in a bunch of other stuff.


--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  dawson@xxxxxxxx  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux