As we are currently working on our openafs package, I want to make sure our kernel modules for it conform to what was agreed upon. But other than the naming, I didn't see a definate 'this is how to do them' list. (If I missed that, point me to it)
Here's what I saw. My example will be openafs, but I am meaning this for others as well.
Name: kernel-module-openafs Version: 1.3.9 Release: 2.6.9-5.0.3.EL.4 Requires: kernel = 2.6.9-5.0.3.EL Provides: kernel-module-openafs
Then the discussion shifted to whether yum and apt would be able to handle this. And there seemed to be a rumble of "it can be done, but it won't be pretty"
Am I missing a thread? Is this really the way we are planning on doing kernel-modules?
Thanks Troy Dawson -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson dawson@xxxxxxxx (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group __________________________________________________
