On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 23:47 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:33 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:34 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > > - kernel-module-foo-1.0-1.src.rpm in repo > > > - check out the package from CVS, build for a new kernel > > > -> get another kernel-module-foo-1.0-1.src.rpm which != the original > > > > Why would the src.rpm not be the same as the original? The spec file and > > source tarball should be consistent, and not affected by a rebuild. > > There are variables like build host, build time, file timestamps, file > modes, --define's passed to the srpm build, possibly other buildsys > configuration variations etc. All of which are sort of cosmetic, but > nevertheless result in a different source rpm. I'm really not worried about cosmetic changes. None of these things should affect the binary packages generated from that src.rpm. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
