Hi * Am Donnerstag, den 30.06.2005, 15:52 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > Anyway, I created a example package with kernel-modules for ndiswrapper > to play a bit with the discussed scheme. It I updated the example found online at http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/MISC.fdr/kernel-module-example/ and in the wiki at http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/KernelModuleProposal Changes to the kernel-module-package: - These macro definitions are now found in the top of the spec file: %{!?kver: %define kver %(uname -r)} %define ksrc %{_usrsrc}/kernels/%{kver}-%{_target_cpu} %define moddir /lib/modules/%{kver}/kernel/misc %define mainpkgname ndiswrapper %define mainpkgversion 1.2 %define mainpgkrelease 1 Yes, in other packages I would not like these "mainpkg*" definitions on the top, but in this type of package I think they are helpful. - The main kernel-module package is now named "kernel-module-%{mainpkgname}-base" (if someones knows something better then "base" tell me). The kernel-module itself is now placed in %package -n kernel-module-%{mainpkgname} So only one SRPM is created no matter how much different kernel-modules are build. Also the CVS tags don't depend on the local kernel-version (I did not try but it got to this idea when I saw "Sacrifice no-args-builds-for-current-kernel for benefit of CVS tag sanity." https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2005-July/msg00229.html ) - Now: Release: %{mainpgkrelease}.%(echo %{kver} | tr - _) Provides: kernel-module = %{kver} as suggested by spot on this list yesterday - Avoid some problems when kernel-module and kernel are deleted in one rpm transaction (anyone knows a better way to fix? "Requires(postun): kernel-%{_target_cpu} = %{kver}" does not work): -- Only depmod when System.map is still there %postun -n kernel-module-%{mainpkgname} [ -e "/boot/System.map-%{kver}" ] && \ /sbin/depmod -e -F /boot/System.map-%{kver} %{kver}> /dev/null || : -- In %files: %dir /lib/modules/%{kver}/ so that dir is removed during remove. CU thl P.S: I'm on a trip the next weeks -- I don't know how often and how long I'll have access to the Internet. So don't expect a fast reply from me during that time. And if you want to propose a kernel-module scheme that I would not like: this is you chance! ;-) -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
