Am Sonntag, den 03.07.2005, 19:10 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Am Sonntag, den 03.07.2005, 19:12 +0300 schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 09:21 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 16:11 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > >
> > > > The kernel-module itself is now placed in
> > > > %package -n kernel-module-%{mainpkgname}
> > > > So only one SRPM is created no matter how much different kernel-modules
> > > > are build.
> > >
> > > This makes sense, good thinking.
> >
> > Except as described in my earlier mail to this thread, if the main
> > package's NVR doesn't change between rebuilds, we have a problem with
> > -debuginfo for these builds.
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2005-June/msg00055.html
>
> Uhh, sorry, I knew I was forgetting something. Yes, that should be
> fixed. So what are our options:
>
> 1) create the debug-pkg ourself and don't rely on the internal rpm
> solution.
[...]
> If 1) is easy I'll vote for that.
I tried, was not that hard (if I didn't miss anything). Results are
found at
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/MISC.fdr/kernel-module-example/
in the wiki at
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/KernelModuleProposal
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
