Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Currently in rawhide at the moment yum treats kernel-devel as installonly
but kernel-smp-devel package is treated as a normal package when doing updates.

Which is the more correct befault behavior?  Do we want multiple
versions of kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages to be installed
by default or do we want these packages to update?

We need the ability to install any or multiple kernel-*devel packages in order to build modules against any target kernel version and arch. Upgrade is never desired with kernel-*devel.


If we want multiple versions to install, as default behavior, do we
want to use a different mechanism then the package name? Like using a
common provides statement that yum can see and act on.. similar to how
kernel and kernel-module packages are sensed?


Yes. Modifying a list of names in yum is bad. The packages themselves should tell the dep resolver "Do not upgrade me!"


Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux