On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:39 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 20:38 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:27 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > and at that point wouldn't the package be obsoleting itself b/c of the > > > version confusion? > > > > Yes. But as I said above, always "=". Not "<=" or anything else. > > then you'll only catch that specific version - I can see that becoming > sticky once you have to limp them along for multiple releases. Multiple releases, yes, but not forever. If I understand "sticky" correctly in this context, that was also noted in my initial post. The question was whether the burden would be manageable and tolerable. To ease it a bit (but also limiting future options somewhat), dropping Release from the otherwise versioned Obsoletes would be possible in most cases. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
