On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 17:17 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Seems like a valid point to me. This should be something that isn't
> > difficult to audit, possibly even via automated script. Jesse, is this
> > something that could bootstrap into Brew?
Tom, perhaps. Not any time soon though.
> You are aware what other distros do/did? They let the build-system chose
> release tag to make sure it's unique and consistent.
>
That works for specs that have %{?dist}, not so much for packages that
are hardcoded. We will have to file bugs and thwap maintainers to use
%{?dist} when it becomes available or follow the guidelines wrt what
they use.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
