Folks, I've whipped up some new OpenAFS packages based on some of what we have discussed and proposed regarding kernel module packages. I'm kinda suprised that Matthew hasn't beaten me to it. :-) These are a rough first attempt. I have left out the debuginfo package stuffs for a future exercise. But I invite folks to comment on them. I'll probably be working on fine tuning these tomorrow during work. After working on this for a few hours I have come to the conclusion that the method of doing kernel-module-foo-source packages is very complex. I'm a big fan of having most of the smarts be in Yum and in this case the build system rather than depend on complex magic from the packager. But I do understand the issues of having multiple similar/same SRPMS, debuginfo packages etc. What's the worst evil? *shrug* SRPMS: http://anduril.pams.ncsu.edu/~slack/SRPMS/kernel-module-openafs-source-1.3.84-6.src.rpm http://anduril.pams.ncsu.edu/~slack/SRPMS/openafs-1.3.84-6.src.rpm SPECS: http://anduril.pams.ncsu.edu/~slack/SPECS/kernel-module-openafs-source.spec http://anduril.pams.ncsu.edu/~slack/SPECS/openafs.spec Jack Neely -- Jack Neely <slack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Realm Linux Administration and Development PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
