Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 19:40 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> Version: 1.1
> (where the value in the Version field is equivalent to the kernel module
> version, NOT the kernel version we're building against (in this example,
> "1", followed by the build revision, in this example ".1")

> If a bugfix needs to be made to the package, then the .1 (build
> revision) is incremented. If a new version of the kernel driver is
> released, then the first part of the Version is incremented, and the
> build revision is reset to .1 (if it is not .1).

Where do you propose that we put the version number of the module
itself, if it's not an integer (e.g., 0.6.3)? Should we have 0.6.3.1 in
that case?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux