On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:20 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Not really important, but imho important enough to send this mail:
>
> Am Samstag, den 02.07.2005, 07:28 -0400 schrieb Ville Skytta:
> >[...]
> > +Release: 2.%(echo %{kver} | tr - _)
> >[...]
>
> I'm still wondering if another character would be better. "_" is already
> used in the %{release} of the kernel -- imho it's a bit confusing. And
> it's not easy to convert the result or this tr"" back to the original
> output of "uname -r" if someone wants to do that.
What would you suggest instead?
Alternately, we could make the Provides: kernel-module = %{kver}, then
you'd have a guaranteed way of having the value spit out in its original
output.
~spot
--
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
