Am Samstag, den 02.07.2005, 08:10 -0500 schrieb Tom 'spot' Callaway:
> On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:20 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Not really important, but imho important enough to send this mail:
> >
> > Am Samstag, den 02.07.2005, 07:28 -0400 schrieb Ville Skytta:
> > >[...]
> > > +Release: 2.%(echo %{kver} | tr - _)
> > >[...]
> >
> > I'm still wondering if another character would be better. "_" is already
> > used in the %{release} of the kernel -- imho it's a bit confusing. And
> > it's not easy to convert the result or this tr"" back to the original
> > output of "uname -r" if someone wants to do that.
>
> What would you suggest instead?
What other chars are allowed in %{release}?
/me looks over my keyboard
= works, but probably is not a good idea
§ works
Or what about
2.%(echo %{kver} | sed 's/-/__/)
Still confusing but at least could be converted back.
> Alternately, we could make the Provides: kernel-module = %{kver},
Without the name? Yeah, why not.
Does the old fedora.us/livna scheme make more sense as a virtual
provides maybe?
Provides: kernel-module-somename-%{kver} = %{version}-%{release}
I'm undecided...
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
