Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:18:45AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:20 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
I personally would suggest a namespace that is tex distribution neutral.
The TDS is pretty much what all modern open source tex implementations
follow and are going to follow, so it makes sense (to me anyway) to use
a neutral namespace, like maybe texmf or something.
thoughts?
Either texmf- or just tex- seem ok to me.
I'd drop the namespace on the binaries and have texmf- on the texmf
tree components. That's closest to upstream conventions and "upstream
distribution" neutral.
+1
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
