On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:20 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > tetex has been EOL'd by upstream. > > I don't know what the Red Hat maintainer intends to do for FC6 - but > clearly at some point the bit rot is going to demand moving to something > else, probably texlive (which is what Debian is doing). > > I'm assuming this means a namespace change for tetex packages. > > I personally would suggest a namespace that is tex distribution neutral. > The TDS is pretty much what all modern open source tex implementations > follow and are going to follow, so it makes sense (to me anyway) to use > a neutral namespace, like maybe texmf or something. > > thoughts? Either texmf- or just tex- seem ok to me. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
