On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:34:35AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:52:01PM -0400, Jack Neely wrote: > > I've whipped up some new OpenAFS packages based on some of what we have > > discussed and proposed regarding kernel module packages. I'm kinda > > suprised that Matthew hasn't beaten me to it. :-) > > Yeah, I was foolishly waiting for things to settle down. :) Nonsense!! > > Honestly, I'm glad someone else is working on this -- I'm glad to help, but > OpenAFS is too big and complicated to depend on just one maintainer. > We've had similar but seprate packages for a long time now. All about finding something that works for both of us well. > I'll take a look at what you've got ... should the rest of this discussion > be moved to the Fedora Extras list? > I don't know. Yum isn't ready to handle kernel modules yet. My patch wont be in 2.3.4 and there more patches that need writing to deal with "I need to install kernel-module-openafs now what VRs do I install?" The hard ones. Since OpenAFS seems to be the common case to a lot of folks, and isn't trivial to package...might as well let folks have a look. :-) Jack -- Jack Neely <slack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Realm Linux Administration and Development PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
