On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > So, under current guidelines, that would basically mean:
> > # cvsdate should be in the format YYYYMMDD
> > %define cvsdate 20050515
> > # 0.0 is used for applications that do not have a proper version number.
> > Version: 0.0
> > # Increment first digit of release if making a change without new source
> > # checkout, if new source checkout, reset to 1.
> > Release: 1.%cvsdate%{?dist}
> > Does that seem reasonable?
> Yes, IMO.
> For snapshots of software with a previous release, i.e. with a real %
> version, the string "cvs" or "svn" after cvsdate in the release field
> would make it more clear that it's a post-release snapshot.
So:
Release: 1.cvs%{cvsdate}%{?dist}
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 73 degrees Fahrenheit.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
