On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:31 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:19:22 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >> X-Fedora : most packages imported from fedora.us use this in the
> >> desktop files
> >>
> >> X-Fedora-Extra : a dozen packages switched to it
> >>
> >> X-Fedora-Extras : package "logjam" uses it
>
> logjam is mine, I must be right!
>
> Seriously though, I don't care. We should pick one and be done with it.
>
> If we don't want to draw any distinction, then "X-Fedora" is fine for
> everyone, and I think that should be the standard for both Core and
> Extras. Anyone opposed?
RPMforge uses X-Red-Hat-Base everywhere. Should we be worried ? :)
What's the effect of changing the category, what is it used for ?
Or are there any plans to use this in the future ? It may make a
difference. If it's a branding kind of thing, we might want to make a
macro out of it.
RPMforge uses %{desktop_vendor} already when using desktop-file-utils so
people can rebrand packages if they care.
Any opinions about both ?
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
