On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Ville [ISO-8859-1] Skyttä wrote:
If anyone is _opposed_ to this change, please voice yourself now.
As long as it triggers known bugs in the distro version where this action is targeted at, rpm in particular; I am.
I'd rather deal with the bugs than keep this thing around. It is embarassing to grown people that have packaged lots of stuff in their lifetimes.
Plus, all current versions of rpm should deal with this issue correctly. The only stuff that breaks is the rpm --freshen on older releases of rpm. Did I mention that rpm has been security errata'd several times since?
As I mentioned before, we're releasing these packages as part of a yum repository. If you download them manually from the web and use rpm --freshen instead of yum to update them, you get to keep all the broken pieces.
I don't think we should care. A fringe usage gets a fringe result. So what?
Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton -- gafton@xxxxxxxxxx -- Red Hat, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Linux is a leprosy; and is having a deleterious effect on the U.S. IT
industry because it is steadily depreciating the value of the software
industry sector."
-- Kenneth Brown, President, Alexis de Tocqueville Institution
