On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Jack Neely wrote: > > > In the case of openafs, that requires some more hackery to figure out if > > > we're supposed to be giving the options for an smp build. > > Doesn't the openafs build figure that out automatically from the kernel > > tree you're pointing it at [1]? Upstream issue? > OpenAFS sucks...you have to pass the build different options for UP > versus SMP. Capital Letter Upstream Issue. :) In their defense, they're trying to maintain software with kernel modules for a dozen different operating systems. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
