On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 21:02 +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > What about these perl cenarios? > > Perl module A::B > Perl module A::B::C (and requires A::B) Thus, whenever Perl module A::B::C is installed, A::B will already be there. If they have a common directory, A::B should own it, not A::B::C. > Perl module A::B::C should always own the A directory > (also owned by A::B) or not ? No. Package at the top of the dependency chain should own it. So, if A::B is the top, then it should own the A directory, since A::B::C can't go in without A::B. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
