-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
[SINP]
>> * vim files (eg: syntax file)
>
> My impression is that vim syntax files really need to be separate
> subpackages because the directory hierarchy they land in is versioned.
> Did you find a way around that?
I managed to come up with a couple of trigger scripts that allowed
me to install the vim syntax files and still support vim updates
although limited to vim 6.3, 6.4, and 7.0 (FC-3 .. FC-6).
The package ghosts the directories /usr/share/vim/vim{63,64,70}
in order to avoid leaving unowned directories during vim upgrades
or removals.
>
>> * bash-completion file
>>
>> it appears to me a little overkill to create a subpackage but I am
>> opened to suggestions.
>>
> Overkill but arguably the cleanest.
Yes. And you still haven't seen the scripts to install vim syntax
files ;)
See the FE asymptote package (specfile also available here
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote.spec).
Again suggestions are welcome to avoid those fragile scripts.
>
>> Right now, almost every package that installs the above files appears
>> to do so in different ways.
>>
>> Just try to see who owns the directories
>>
>> * rpm -qf /etc/bash_completion.d/
>> bash-completion-20060301-1.fc5
>> rpmlint-0.76-1.fc5
>
> So this is the third (and deprecated?) method -- multiple owners of the
> directories.
jpo
- --
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto: jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo *
* gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEhcRxl0metZG9hRsRAkvnAJ0Y9d3gxXb+vA0Q/b/N3ZuoMdcAewCfRrlD
Xhum0ByzbmBX6cykhyDH4Z8=
=6gNr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
