On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:55:59PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > Honestly? I agree. Even if it means we end up with two copies of the > full source in two SRPMS. > Unless someone is violently opposed to splitting the SRPMS as policy > (and can come up with a way to resolve the unnecessary userland package > bumps/rebuilds), thats what I'm inclined to adopt. I'm fine with this or with the ifarch conditional plan -- either way has its ugliness. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
