On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Michael Schwendt wrote: > "ulogd" in Extras is similar with regard to sub-packages for database > support. Thanks for that suggestion. I'll take a look at it, and see what I can do about it. > Or does it create a single executable only, which is linked to a single > chosen database library? In that case, your packages would conflict, > because you would have two executables, one linked against mysql, the > other linked against pgsql. Bad. That is the case. > "binaries with the same name" sounds like a conflict. If you want > mutually exclusive sub-packages ser-mysql and ser-pgsql, you still need > non-conflicting file names and a mechanism like "alternatives" to > activate the desired database version after installation. Hmpf. That's what I feared. I think, I'll have to do some more hacking on this .spec. bye, andreas -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
