On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > >As another example, gpgme03-devel and gpgme-devel. Used to building > >in clean build environments where only the needed build requirements > >are pulled in, there was no need to relocate either package and make > >it possible to install both at once. > > Hmm. I think in the case of foo3 and foo, if they need to be installed > at the same time, they need to follow the openssl example, and not > conflict. openssl is somewhat different, there's no -devel for the older one. Usually providing two different versions of lib packages without conflicts is fairly trivial, but a bit less so for their -devel subpackages.
