-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >Hmmm... Yes; rhpl's Makefiles seem to make some rather problematic >assumptions. What other packages do you know have similarly fragile >upstream build scripts? Since we're not accepting python-2.4, I've not downloaded very much of the FC4 stack to discover exactly what's still broken. In this case, I think I was curious to see if https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135657 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135657 had been released as we need a proper extended url basic http authentication syntax to allow up2date to connect to our servers. Again, these patches were submitted almost a year ago, and we still have to maintain our own forks :( >>make PYTHON=python%{pythonversion} PYTHONINCLUDE=%{pythoninclude} >>LIBDIR=/lib >Why the LIBDIR? That would seems to break things for x86_64 with no >apparent gain. Dunno - there was obviously something screwed with the link-edit step. I'm a little surpised that /lib is not on the default link-library path in the first place ... Alan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLuf+CfroLk4EZpkRAluiAKDQPrvl1+dzlC/4cVU+j4XF9/WNdACfVRdC zJ6eqgT+rBOTm+ZFXh2w4k0= =IfYK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
