On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:14:22PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > Yes. If you need to use the version number of the module itself without > a build revision, then we can use something like: > Provides: kernel-module-openafs-version = 0.6.3 This seems yicky. What if we do this, and so we're providing kernel-module-openafs-version = 1.3.84, and then the upstream decides to do a bugfix release and call it 1.3.84.1? With your scheme, our old kernel module was *already* 1.3.84.1. Why *not* just put package release #s in the package release #? -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
