On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:03 -0400, Jack Neely wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:09:15AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > I've taken the liberty of starting a page at > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/KernelModuleProposal which is > > intended to be a collection of what we have so far. Judging from what > > has been said to date we still don't have an effective scheme for > > Version and Release. > > > > -- > > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ > > > > gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 > > %{version} and %{release} being what they would normally be is what > we've boiled down to. Neither one contains the kernel VR. %{version} > is the version of the kernel module ('1.3.84' for kernel-module-openafs) > and %{release} being the build ID ('1'), per normal. We really need a unique NVR for each package. Using kver in %{release} is the best way to accomplish this. Otherwise, we overwrite in the repo. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
