On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 07:10:41PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > My proposal: Put it at the same place where the normal module would be > places by a normal "make install" of that package. That has several > benefits: [benefits snipped] Drawback -- some packages (like OpenAFS, go figure) want to put the module in a really stupid place by default. We should follow the FHS and Fedora/RH precedent of fixing install location of files when the package is non-standard. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 77 degrees Fahrenheit. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
