Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> the biggest problem with the kernel-module packaging discussion is that
> all of the solutions y'all have come up with have been excruciatingly
> complex. We've discussed them on the yum-devel list and the result is
> 'ugh, these are painful' both to implement the code for and to develop
> the packages themselves. I'm not sure any solution will match up to
> everyone's concept of 'correct'.
> 
> -sv
> 

Agreed.  This is most of the reason I haven't done any more work with
added kernel module functionality to Yum.  Complexity should be in the
tools rather than depend on each packager to make a complex package
"correctly."

Jack

-- 
Jack Neely <jjneely@xxxxxxxx>
Campus Linux Services Project Lead
PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4  EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux