Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 15:34 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit : > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 22:17 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 14:56 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit : > > > > > If the mono package does not include .so files, it should be BuildArch: > > > noarch and use /usr/lib. > > > > Why on earth do you want it in /usr/lib if you know it's > > arch-independant ? > > Because they're still libraries, in a weird perverted Windowsy way? So what ? Are their any less libraries than jar files ? lisp packages ? All those end up in /usr/share in Fedora now, as the FHS demands The "it's code, therefore it shouldn't go in /usr/share" argument is bogus. We have a ton of code in /usr/share, both shared and app-specific -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging