Re: Mono Packaging Issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 22:17 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 14:56 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> 
> > If the mono package does not include .so files, it should be BuildArch:
> > noarch and use /usr/lib.
> 
> Why on earth do you want it in /usr/lib if you know it's
> arch-independant ?

Because they're still libraries, in a weird perverted Windowsy way?

It might be worth examining exactly what Debian/Ubuntu/SuSE do here.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux