Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 17:25 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 03.07.2005, 09:21 -0500 schrieb Tom 'spot' Callaway:

> > > - The main kernel-module package is now named
> > > "kernel-module-%{mainpkgname}-base" (if someones knows something better
> > > then "base" tell me). 
> > 
> > Perhaps instead of -base, it could be -source. I'm ambivalent on that,
> > really.
> 
> Yeah, source might be better. Changed.

(Still has the -debuginfo problem.)

> Don't ask me why. Anyone any idea what's wrong here?

rpm's erasure ordering is known to still have problems (not only the
CLI; yum exhibits the same problem).  This problem is not limited to
kernel module packages nor leftover dirs; for example %postun scriptlets
are affected too (/boot/System.map-%{kver} may have disappeared in this
case).  Dunno if PreReq instead of Requires, or Requires +
Requires(postun) instead of Requires would help.

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux