Le samedi 04 février 2006 à 01:07 +0100, Dawid Gajownik a écrit : > Hi! > > Houston, we've got a problem ;) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179439#c7 > > Do we have any naming guidelines concerning packages with fonts? There > is some inconsistency: Nothing new, the "problem" was discussed when vera got in fedora.us and then again when it was merged upstream (you can look up the bugzilla entries/ ML threads) FC tends to put fonts- first except when it's a subpackage. This helps when you do a stupid sort (but in the days of autodep resolvers the use of basic sort is somehow limited - tools are smarter nowadays) (Note this is a new rule, for a very long time RHL/FC didn't have any particular rule) FE (and yes I have my share of responsibility there) tends to put -fonts last as its more consistent with english, FC font subpackages and external repositories (in the vera case bistream-vera-fonts already existed in the helix gnome repo) My own take is live and let live, the benefits of harmonising are not worth the renaming pains. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
