So how does this progress?
We have had three suggested naming conventions, thanks to Toshio
Kuratomi, with most of the weight leaning on #2, to recap them:
1) Ignore the enduser confusion and go with Ralf's naming:
i386-rtems4.7-binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.fc6.i386.rpm
2) Namespace the whole thing:
cross-i386-rtems4.7-binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.fc6.i386.rpm
3) Play games with the '-' to avoid the "it's an rpm separator" association:
i386_rtems4.7_binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.fc6.i386.rpm
So far, there has been no resolve. Do we need to have more people have a
say? Is this a storm in a tea cup?
Thanks
Michael
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
