On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:42:18PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:13:49 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > Mea culpa. Sylpheed was in Core and I wanted gpgme-1.0 in Core so I patched > > it to use the newer gpgme and it was accepted upstream. Now sylpheed's out > > and we still don't have gpgme-1.0 in Core. (kmail uses it...) > > GnuPG 2 is not ready. Hence GPGME 1.0.x could not be built with the S/MIME > part (aka GPGSM). > True. But gpgme doesn't have a hard requirement on gnupg 2. In line with the two steps forward, one step backwards philosophy, I'd be happy with a gpgme-1 that only uses gnupg-1 and add S/Mime features when gnupg 2 is ready. This gets us a kmail with some signing support. OTOH, I mainly want to use gpgme in my code, not for any mailer. So for me, Extras is good enough. -Toshio
