Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:00 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:48 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > 
> > How so?  We wouldn't be building the module package again for older
> > kernels unless there are some real changes in it.  To illustrate
> > (leaving "tr - _" needed for the release tag aside for a moment):
> 
> The buildsystem has no way of knowing this, nor do users. The only
> reasonable way is to rebuild for all existant kernels when we increment
> release.

Well, we obviously disagree here, as well as on a number of other issues
in this thread.  But it seems I got my concerns across, so I'll happily
switch back to the "waits patiently" mode now.

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux