On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 10:27 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "TC" == Tom Callaway <Tom> writes: > > >> * some use N%{?dist}.M and increment M with each build-iteration > > TC> ...and these are not. More bugs to file! > > This method has been suggested for use on extras-list as the only way > to bump a package version without also bumping the version of all > later releases. I would suggest that's why it's being used > currently. That's exactly the "non-devel" case, I was referring to in my other mail. It's handy when spec files fork between FC-releases, and when packagers can't/don't want to kept them identical. Rex' case however is the opposite. He wants idential specs, so he can't avoid incrementing N. > What would be the proper way to handle that situation? Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging