On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 04:29:29 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote: > > > RPMforge uses X-Red-Hat-Base everywhere. Should we be worried ? :) > > What's the effect of changing the category, what is it used for ? > > X-Red-Hat-Base puts a desktop menu entry into the top menu, while > X-Red-Hat-Extra marks desktop menu entries which appear in the > "More ..." sub-menus. X-Fedora is just a placeholder. I don't like a meaningless placeholder. Either we anticipate a change in the future and we should define that use (having a single identifier for all packages makes no sense). Or we drop it. X-Red-Hat-Base and X-Red-Hat-Extra has a meaning, although I'm not sure why it includes 'Red-Hat'. Maybe we need a policy of what is expected in the first level menu, and what in the second. (Or another scheme). PS I don't have any 'More...' submenus on my FC3 even though some of the desktop-files do use X-Red-Hat-Extra. -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
