On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 12:02 +0000, Jose' Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 11:49, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > or allow the fully license as > > > described in the DESCRIPTION file? > > > > Do you mean the %description tag? I am opposed to this. > > Nope. DESCRIPTION is the the counterpart of the spec file in R modules, > where all the information that R uses to build the module is placed. > > So the setence above should be read as: > > ... or allow the full license as described by author in the R module. I'd say, include DESCRIPTION as %doc, and keep License: as simple as possible. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
