Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 18:01 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:28:11 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
> > 
> Michael, my point is, if almost everything will be in Extras, what use
> does it have to tag them the same way ? I'd much rather have something
> explicit for that purpose, like:
> 
> 	TopLevel
> 	SubLevel
> 
> Than something that you will use as a default tag but has no practical 
> use other than this. In fact, if there are other uses besides the
> TopLevel/SubLevel and the real category, I'd much rather have those
> explicitly defined and named now too :)
> 
> Maybe:
> 
> 	Novice
> 	Advanced
> 	Expert
> 
> would be a useful tag to put on applications. Or
> 
> 	Stable
> 	Unstable (or Beta)

This sounds like freedesktop.org discussion.  Lobbying for stuff should
happen there IMHO.

Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux