Fedora Extras

• Thread Index

• Tracker?
  • From: Thomas J. Baker
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Potential Orphans: obconf, obmenu, and openbox
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Luke Macken
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Luke Macken
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-12
  • From: buildsys
• Potential Orphans: obconf, obmenu, and openbox
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: find_lang macro (was: Re: Democracy player anyone?)
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• find_lang macro (was: Re: Democracy player anyone?)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-12
  • From: buildsys
• Reviewer wanted for freetype1
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Estimate the size of extras ?
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-11
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-11
  • From: buildsys
• package for tailor - a VCS repository conversion tool
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Packagers, use: plague-client requeue ...
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Change of e-mail address, not able to submit plague build jobs
  • From: Joost Soeterbroek
• Re: Packagers, use: plague-client requeue ...
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Packagers, use: plague-client requeue ...
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• gnome application menu troubles
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Quick review needed
  • From: José Matos
• Quick review needed
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-10
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-10
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/seamonkey/FC-5 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE find-external-requires, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-default-plugin-less-annoying.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-psfonts.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.0-prdtoa.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-nss-system-nspr.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5-with-system-nss.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.4.1-ppc64.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.3-gnome-vfs-default-app.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.5-g-application-name.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-nspr-packages.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-psm-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE mozilla-xpcom-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE pango-cairo.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-1.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-cairo-bug5136.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-configure.patch, 1.4, NONE seamonkey-disable-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-bookmarks.html, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-prefs.js, 1.2, NONE seamonkey-fedora-home-page.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-make-package.pl, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mozconfig, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.sh.in, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.6, NONE thunderbird-0.7.3-gnome-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE thunderbird-1.5-bug304720.patch, 1.1, NONE
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• About GPSdrive
  • From: Amit Dey
• Re: rpms/seamonkey/FC-5 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE find-external-requires, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-default-plugin-less-annoying.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-psfonts.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.0-prdtoa.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-nss-system-nspr.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5-with-system-nss.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.4.1-ppc64.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.3-gnome-vfs-default-app.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.5-g-application-name.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-nspr-packages.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-psm-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE mozilla-xpcom-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE pango-cairo.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-1.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-cairo-bug5136.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-configure.patch, 1.4, NONE seamonkey-disable-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-bookmarks.html, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-prefs.js, 1.2, NONE seamonkey-fedora-home-page.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-make-package.pl, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mozconfig, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.sh.in, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.6, NONE thunderbird-0.7.3-gnome-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE thunderbird-1.5-bug304720.patch, 1.1, NONE
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: rpms/seamonkey/FC-5 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE find-external-requires, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-default-plugin-less-annoying.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-psfonts.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.0-prdtoa.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-nss-system-nspr.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5-with-system-nss.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.4.1-ppc64.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.3-gnome-vfs-default-app.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.5-g-application-name.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-nspr-packages.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-psm-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE mozilla-xpcom-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE pango-cairo.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-1.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-cairo-bug5136.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-configure.patch, 1.4, NONE seamonkey-disable-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-bookmarks.html, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-prefs.js, 1.2, NONE seamonkey-fedora-home-page.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-make-package.pl, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mozconfig, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.sh.in, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.6, NONE thunderbird-0.7.3-gnome-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE thunderbird-1.5-bug304720.patch, 1.1, NONE
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-10
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Need some ideas for small project
  • From: Jima
• Re: repoclosure, multilib, and gift pkg
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: repoclosure, multilib, and gift pkg
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Need some ideas for small project
  • From: Eric S. Raymond
• Re: Buildsys troubles
  • From: Dan Williams
• Need some ideas for small project
  • From: Amit Dey
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-10
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-10
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Buildsys troubles
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-10
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Buildsys troubles
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Buildsys troubles
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Seamonkey
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Seamonkey
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Package removal request?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Package removal request?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: rpms/seamonkey/FC-5 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE find-external-requires, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-default-plugin-less-annoying.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-psfonts.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.0-prdtoa.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-nss-system-nspr.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5-with-system-nss.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.4.1-ppc64.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.3-gnome-vfs-default-app.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.5-g-application-name.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-nspr-packages.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-psm-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE mozilla-xpcom-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE pango-cairo.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-1.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-cairo-bug5136.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-configure.patch, 1.4, NONE seamonkey-disable-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-bookmarks.html, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-prefs.js, 1.2, NONE seamonkey-fedora-home-page.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-make-package.pl, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mozconfig, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.sh.in, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.6, NONE thunderbird-0.7.3-gnome-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE thunderbird-1.5-bug304720.patch, 1.1, NONE
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: rpms/seamonkey/FC-5 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE find-external-requires, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-default-plugin-less-annoying.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-0.7.3-psfonts.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.0-prdtoa.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-nss-system-nspr.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5-with-system-nss.patch, 1.1, NONE firefox-1.5.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.4.1-ppc64.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.3-gnome-vfs-default-app.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-1.7.5-g-application-name.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-nspr-packages.patch, 1.1, NONE mozilla-psm-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE mozilla-xpcom-exclude-list, 1.1, NONE pango-cairo.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-1.0.1-dumpstack.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-cairo-bug5136.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-configure.patch, 1.4, NONE seamonkey-disable-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-bookmarks.html, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-fedora-default-prefs.js, 1.2, NONE seamonkey-fedora-home-page.patch, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail-icon.png, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mail.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-make-package.pl, 1.1, NONE seamonkey-mozconfig, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.desktop, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.sh.in, 1.1, NONE seamonkey.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.6, NONE thunderbird-0.7.3-gnome-uriloader.patch, 1.1, NONE thunderbird-1.5-bug304720.patch, 1.1, NONE
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Package removal request?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Package removal request?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Orphaning two more packages (Re: Orphaning three packages officially)
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Michel Salim
• Notice: New maintainer for QScintilla
  • From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Maintenance policy for older releases
  • From: Michel Salim
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-09
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Josh Bressers
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Josh Bressers
• imlib2 - Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Disturbing lack of FE security updates announcements!
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Pb with plague
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Pb with plague
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Circular dependencies
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-06
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: Estimate the size of extras ?
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-08
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Looking for some easy to fix code (not packaging) bugs
  • From: Russell Harrison
• Re: Looking for some easy to fix code (not packaging) bugs
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Dimitris Glezos
• Estimate the size of extras ?
  • From: David Timms
• galeon - Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-06
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Estimate the size of extras ?
  • From: Adrian Reber
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-08
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Looking for some easy to fix code (not packaging) bugs
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Circular dependencies
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Orphaning three packages officially
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• Re: Orphaning three packages officially
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Looking for some easy to fix code (not packaging) bugs
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Estimate the size of extras ?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-06
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Anyone remember aumix ?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Anyone remember aumix ?
  • From: Gabriel L. Somlo
• Re: Anyone remember aumix ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: Orphaning zope, plone, mpc and gmpc
  • From: Adrian Reber
• Re: Anyone remember aumix ?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Anyone remember aumix ?
  • From: Gabriel L. Somlo
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: rpms/granule/devel granule.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Democracy player anyone?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: wine apps menu entries
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• Re: Extras + Legacy or not?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-06
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Extras + Legacy or not?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Extras + Legacy or not?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Extras + Legacy or not?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Further to the Mono discussion: review request for vala
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-06
  • From: buildsys
• Further to the Mono discussion: review request for vala
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: rpms/gnupg2/devel .cvsignore, 1.15, 1.16 gnupg2.spec, 1.54, 1.55 sources, 1.17, 1.18
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/gnupg2/devel .cvsignore, 1.15, 1.16 gnupg2.spec, 1.54, 1.55 sources, 1.17, 1.18
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-05
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-05
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Orphaning zope, plone, mpc and gmpc
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-05
  • From: buildsys
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: wine apps menu entries
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-04
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: wine apps menu entries
  • From: Leszek Matok
• Re: wine apps menu entries
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: rpms/mock/FC-5 arch-specific-repo.patch, NONE, 1.1 mock.spec, 1.23, 1.24
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-04
  • From: buildsys
• Re: wine apps menu entries
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• Re: wine apps menu entries
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• wine apps menu entries
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: rpms/mock/FC-5 arch-specific-repo.patch, NONE, 1.1 mock.spec, 1.23, 1.24
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: dragoran
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: pb with livna's update ?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-03
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: please do not sign and push scorched3d update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: camstream in extras
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-03
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Linus Walleij
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Linus Walleij
• Re: please do not sign and push scorched3d update
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: failing kmod build for FC-6
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: extras package that simplifies installation of vmware packages ?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-03
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-03
  • From: buildsys
• Re: failing kmod build for FC-6
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Another buildsys oddity?
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Another buildsys oddity?
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Another buildsys oddity?
  • From: Paul
• Re: pb with livna's update ?
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: comps comps-fe5.xml.in, 1.184, 1.185 comps-fe6.xml.in, 1.208, 1.209 comps-fe7.xml.in, 1.6, 1.7
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: camstream in extras
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: camstream in extras
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: comps comps-fe5.xml.in, 1.184, 1.185 comps-fe6.xml.in, 1.208, 1.209 comps-fe7.xml.in, 1.6, 1.7
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: gemi yum repository rebuilt for FC6
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: comps comps-fe5.xml.in, 1.184, 1.185 comps-fe6.xml.in, 1.208, 1.209 comps-fe7.xml.in, 1.6, 1.7
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Static library in librsync-devel
  • From: Robert Scheck
• Re: FESCo Meeting Summary Nov 02 2006
  • From: Josh Boyer
• please do not sign and push scorched3d update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: camstream in extras
  • From: lonely wolf
• Requesting sponsorship for gfs-utils & gfs-kmod for FC6 Extras
  • From: Chris Feist
• Re: gemi yum repository rebuilt for FC6
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: failing kmod build for FC-6
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• ppc64 buildsys problem?
  • From: Paul
• Re: gemi yum repository rebuilt for FC6
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: camstream in extras
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: camstream in extras
  • From: Michael Thomas
• camstream in extras
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: extras package that simplifies installation of vmware packages ?
  • From: David Timms
• FESCo Meeting Summary Nov 02 2006
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: FE Package Status of Nov 2, 2006
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: FE Package Status of Nov 2, 2006
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• FE Package Status of Nov 2, 2006
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: failing kmod build for FC-6
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: extras package that simplifies installation of vmware packages ?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• extras package that simplifies installation of vmware packages ?
  • From: David Timms
• Re: failing kmod build for FC-6
  • From: Paul Howarth
• failing kmod build for FC-6
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras Meeting Minutes 2006-10-26
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Fedora Extras Meeting Minutes 2006-10-26
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Builders are down
  • From: Mike McGrath
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-01
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Free enough for FE
  • From: Michel Salim
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-11-01
  • From: buildsys
• Free enough for FE
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: is fc5 building closed?
  • From: Jean-Luc Fontaine
• Re: is fc5 building closed?
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: is fc5 building closed?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: "Piotr \"Raven\" Drąg"
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: "Piotr \"Raven\" Drąg"
• is fc5 building closed?
  • From: Jean-Luc Fontaine
• gemi yum repository rebuilt for FC6
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31
  • From: Matthias Saou
• gkrellm update, please check your plugins
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-31
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• New libgda and libgnomedb packages available for testing
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• find-lang.sh syntax
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: redhat-lsb not in ExceptionList?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-29
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: redhat-lsb not in ExceptionList?
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Duplicity is orphaned
  • From: Robert Scheck
• redhat-lsb not in ExceptionList?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: wvs-data
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: wvs-data
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: comps.xml in Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: wvs-data
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic
  • From: Paul
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• SH fingerprints for FE machines
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic
  • From: Paul
• Re: wvs-data
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Heads-up: mono-basic
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: wvs-data
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: comps.xml in Extras
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Tim Jackson
• wvs-data (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-28)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-28
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-28
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Invalid rebuilds (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Invalid rebuilds (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27)
  • From: Mike McGrath
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/FC-6 wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Invalid rebuilds (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: comps.xml in Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• comps.xml in Extras (was: Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Thanks everyone for your great work in Extras
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-27
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• repoview for debuginfo packages?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27
  • From: buildsys
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: gcstar module disappeared from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• gcstar module disappeared from CVS
  • From: Christian Jodar
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Thanks everyone for your great work in Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Matt Domsch
• 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Headsup: ogre soname change in next push
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Enhanced AWOL policy
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Howto build i386 packages on x86_64 FC-6
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Headsup: significant libcddb update for devel repo
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Extras build system back up
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-27
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: State of multilib development update
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Howto build i386 packages on x86_64 FC-6
  • From: Hans de Goede
• State of multilib development update
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Extras build system back up
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Extras build system back up
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Build machine failures
  • From: Mike McGrath
• FCXStatus wiki pages
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/geomview/devel geomview.spec,1.28,1.29
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/geomview/devel geomview.spec,1.28,1.29
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Extras build system back up
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Extras build system back up
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change (was: Re: jd)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: I would like to take ownership of gnome-themes-extras
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• I would like to take ownership of gnome-themes-extras
  • From: Chris Ausbrooks
• Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change (was: Re: jd)
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: jd
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-25
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25
  • From: Anthony Green
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25
  • From: Anthony Green
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: David Lutterkort
• FESCo Meeting 2006-10-19
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• FE Package Status of Oct 25, 2006
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: New Project: pungi - A Fedora release composing tool
  • From: Nikolai
• Re: jd
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: RPM
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: jd
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: jd
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• jd (was: Re: Build-sys weirdness)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: How to rename a cvs module
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Attention, all FE packagers!
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)
  • From: Jima
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: testing repo (was: Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• testing repo (was: Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-25
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Build-sys weirdness
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: xview anyone ?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-24
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: RPM
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• New Project: pungi - A Fedora release composing tool
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-24
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-24
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24
  • From: buildsys
• xview anyone ?
  • From: Christian Iseli
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Buildsys Outage
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Warning possible incompatible imlib2 update! (devel branch only)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Buildsys Outage
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Splitting an existing package
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Splitting an existing package
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Splitting an existing package
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Nils Philippsen
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: RPM
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Fwd: RPM
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Re: RPM
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Reminder about CVS SYNC
  • From: Mike McGrath
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RPM
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: RPM
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: RPM
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Ralph Angenendt
• Re: RPM
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: RPM
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: RPM
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Alexander Boström
• Re: RPM
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: RPM
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-10-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: How to rename a cvs module
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?
  • From: Michał Bentkowski
• Re: Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Mike McGrath
• Re: RPM
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-23
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-23
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Where should go Perl libraries files?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fwd: RPM
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Buildsys Downtime
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Where should go Perl libraries files?
  • From: Garrick Staples
• Re: How to rename a cvs module
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: How to rename a cvs module
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• How to rename a cvs module
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: Fwd: RPM
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Fwd: RPM
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Fwd: RPM
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Fwd: RPM
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Re: RPM
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: RPM
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: RPM
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Webspace for a package review
  • From: Oliver Falk
• Re: Webspace for a package review
  • From: Oliver Falk
• Where should go Perl libraries files?
  • From: Christian Jodar
• Re: Webspace for a package review
  • From: Gawain Lynch
• Re: Webspace for a package review
  • From: Oliver Falk
• Re: RPM
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: RPM
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Re: RPM
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Webspace for a package review
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Webspace for a package review
  • From: Gawain Lynch
• Re: RPM
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: RPM
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM
  • From: Norman Gaywood
• Re: Failed Builds Last 24 hours
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Failed Builds Last 24 hours
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• RPM
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: hammer3 build server causes trouble
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: hammer3 build server causes trouble
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Something wrong with ppc builder?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Something wrong with ppc builder?
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• build kmods for ppc64 (was: Re: exclude arch for PPC64)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Owen Taylor
• Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?
  • From: Michał Bentkowski
• hammer3 build server causes trouble
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Paul
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: José Matos
• Re: Something wrong with ppc builder?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Something wrong with ppc builder?
  • From: Garrick Staples
• Re: rpms/libburn/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 libburn.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Owen Taylor
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: John Ellson
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Owen Taylor
• RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/libburn/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 libburn.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Paul
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Ian Chapman
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Paul
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras
  • From: Owen Taylor
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Clamav packages and compatibility problems
  • From: Alberto Chiodi
• Re: Clamav packages and compatibility problems
  • From: lonely wolf
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• devel package for only two symlinks?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Clamav packages and compatibility problems
  • From: Alberto Chiodi
• exclude arch for PPC64
  • From: Paul
• Re: How to do Graphics Programming
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: Package naming query
  • From: Michel Salim
• How to do Graphics Programming
  • From: Amit Dey
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-20
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Package naming query
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-20
  • From: buildsys