Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> Offhand, I couldn't disagree more. You mean you'd rather live with the >> bugs >> that those 100+ package updates fix? No thanks. If you don't want the >> churn, then don't update your el4 boxen. > > So, you're requiring the user to explicitly browse the updates for > security vs. non-security fixes, for example? For iteration 1 of enterprise extras, yes. I have yet to see a reasonable alternative: every proposal I've seen so far adds unreasonable bureaucracy and/or administrative overhead. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
